Retailer shakes up supplier relationships to maintain standards and cut costs
- River Island threatens to return clothing orders over quality issues.
- The retailer demands discounts on goods that do not meet its standards.
- Suppliers report increased pressure for retrospective discounts.
- Invoice discounts have risen from 5% to 10%, causing supplier frustration.
- New co-managing director Jane Eskriett is overhauling supplier strategy.
River Island is taking a tough stance on quality control, threatening to return clothing orders to suppliers that fail to meet its standards. Reports indicate that the fashion retailer has requested discounts on items it deems unsatisfactory, with one supplier revealing that River Island accused them of delivering tops that were slightly too short. The retailer warned that it would return the entire shipment unless a discount was agreed upon. Additionally, suppliers have noted a surge in River Island’s requests for retrospective discounts, which are discounts applied after an invoice has been issued. The retailer has increased its invoice discount rate from 5% to 10%, leading to dissatisfaction among suppliers who feel pressured to justify their pricing. A source from River Island mentioned that Jane Eskriett, the new co-managing director, is significantly revamping the company’s supplier strategy, which includes cutting ties with some suppliers and onboarding new ones. Eskriett, who joined from Boohoo, is working alongside Richard Grainger, a former Next executive, to navigate the challenging retail landscape.
Factuality Level: 8
Factuality Justification: The article provides accurate and objective information about River Island’s issues with suppliers regarding quality and sizing, as well as changes in their discount policy. It also mentions the new co-managing director Jane Eskriett’s impact on supplier strategy. However, it lacks some details about JD Sports and the challenging trading environment.
Noise Level: 4
Noise Justification: The article provides some relevant information about River Island’s actions towards its suppliers regarding quality and sizing issues, but it lacks in-depth analysis or exploration of the consequences for both parties involved. It also includes a vague reference to JD Sports without providing any context or comparison between the two companies.
Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: River Island’s supplier relationships and negotiations impact financial markets of the fashion industry.
Financial Rating Justification: The article discusses River Island’s actions affecting its suppliers, which can have an impact on their financial transactions and business relationships in the fashion retail sector.
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: Other
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: Minor
Extreme Rating Justification: There is no extreme event mentioned in the text, but the article discusses River Island’s strict quality and sizing standards and its impact on suppliers. The situation may be considered a minor issue within the retail industry.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ebd4/4ebd41da6d39fae7a9469c8c878be2fc859f68e1" alt=""