Supermarket Loses Trademark Battle Over Name
- Iceland Foods loses EU trademark appeal for ‘Iceland’
- Trademark deemed descriptive rather than distinctive due to its link with Iceland’s diverse product range
- Retailer faces ongoing challenges in enforcing exclusivity in EU markets
- Legal battle against Icelandic government and affiliated bodies since 2016
Iceland Foods has lost its appeal against the invalidation of its EU trademark for the word ‘Iceland’. The General Court of the European Union upheld previous rulings that found the trademark to be descriptive rather than distinctive, due to its clear link with Iceland’s production and export of a wide range of goods. This means the supermarket faces ongoing challenges in enforcing exclusivity in EU markets. The retailer secured the trademark in 2014 but has faced legal battles since 2016 with the Icelandic government, who argue that the term describes the country of origin rather than a distinct brand. The court noted the mark’s descriptive nature extends to retail services linked to those products. While the ruling does not stop Iceland Foods from trading under the name in the EU, it limits its ability to prevent others from using ‘Iceland’ in connection with goods and services.
Factuality Level: 8
Factuality Justification: The article provides accurate and objective information about Iceland Foods’ trademark dispute, citing relevant sources and experts’ opinions. It does not contain digressions or irrelevant details, nor does it present personal perspectives as universally accepted truths. However, it includes a link to an unrelated newsletter sign-up which may be seen as slightly misleading.
Noise Level: 2
Noise Justification: The article provides relevant information on a legal decision and its implications for Iceland Foods and their trademark dispute. It includes quotes from an expert in the field and briefly mentions the history of the case without any irrelevant or misleading information.
Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: No
Financial Rating Justification: The article discusses a legal dispute between Iceland Foods and the EU over the trademark for the word ‘Iceland’. This affects the company’s ability to exclusively use the term as a brand name in the EU, which may impact its business operations and marketing strategy. However, it does not directly impact financial markets or specific companies.
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Extreme Rating Justification: There is no extreme event in the text and it does not meet the criteria for an extreme event as it is related to a legal dispute over trademark rights, which is not considered an extreme event.
www.retailgazette.co.uk