Zero-hours contracts, unfair dismissals, and union levies at stake
- Conservative and Liberal Democrat peers in the House of Lords vote against Employment Rights Bill
- Zero-hours contracts, unfair dismissal from day one, industrial action ballot thresholds, and union members paying political levies affected
- Usdaw general secretary Joanne Thomas condemns the decision as ‘staggering’
- Labour’s proposal to end two-year service qualification for challenging unfair dismissal rejected
- Bill returns to House of Commons for further voting and back to Lords later
The House of Lords has voted against various parts of the Employment Rights Bill, sending it back to the House of Commons. Conservative and Liberal Democrat peers rejected measures concerning zero-hour contracts, unfair dismissal from day one, industrial action ballot thresholds, and union members paying political levies. Usdaw general secretary Joanne Thomas criticized the decision, urging MPs to reverse the changes when the bill returns to the Commons. The Lords also voted against Labour’s proposal to remove the 50% turnout threshold for a valid industrial action ballot of trade union members and automatic sign-up of new members to pay a political levy. Making work more secure was a key part of Labour’s manifesto, which won last year’s general election. The bill will now be voted on in the Commons before returning to the Lords.
Factuality Level: 8
Factuality Justification: The article provides accurate information about the House of Lords’ vote on various parts of the Employment Rights Bill and includes quotes from relevant sources. It does not contain digressions or irrelevant details, nor does it present personal opinions as facts. However, it could be improved by providing more context and background information on the bill and its implications.
Noise Level: 3
Noise Justification: The article provides relevant information about the voting outcome in the House of Lords regarding the Employment Rights Bill and includes quotes from key figures. However, it could benefit from more context and analysis on the implications of these decisions for workers and businesses, as well as a broader discussion on the political dynamics at play.
Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: The event impacts companies’ labor policies and employment practices.
Financial Rating Justification: The article discusses changes in the Employment Rights Bill, which affects labor policies and could impact how companies manage their employees. This has financial implications for businesses as it may affect their costs and legal liabilities.
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: Other
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: Minor
Extreme Rating Justification: There is no extreme event mentioned in the article. The discussion revolves around changes to the Employment Rights Bill regarding zero-hour contracts, unfair dismissal, industrial action ballot thresholds, and union membership fees.
www.retailsector.co.uk