Legal battle ensues as investor accuses brand of deception
- Former Revolution Beauty investor files £45m claim against the brand
- Accuses the business of “deceit”
- Investor sold shares for £5.7m after Revolution’s value collapsed
- Claims of “deceit, negligent misstatement and/or misrepresentation”
- Claims of £39m against Revolution and £6.2m for “consequential losses”
- Revolution Beauty strongly contests the claims
- Raised profit outlook with expected adjusted EBITDA of “at least” £12.5m
- Superdry co-founder and CEO issues ultimatum to shareholders
Revolution Beauty is facing a legal battle as a former investor has filed a claim of over £45m, accusing the business of "deceit". The investor purchased a £45m stake in the company in July 2021 but sold the shares for £5.7m in 2022 due to Revolution’s declining value. The investor alleges "deceit, negligent misstatement and/or misrepresentation" during the share purchase. A claim of £39m is being made against Revolution, along with an additional claim of £6.2m for "consequential losses". Revolution Beauty has stated that it strongly contests the claims and will consult with its legal advisors. Despite legal battles and shareholder revolts following an accounting scandal, Revolution Beauty recently raised its profit outlook, expecting an adjusted EBITDA of "at least" £12.5m for the year. Superdry co-founder and CEO, Julian Dunkerton, has issued an ultimatum to shareholders this week.
Factuality Level: 7
Factuality Justification: The article provides a clear account of a legal battle between Revolution Beauty and a former investor, detailing the claims made by both parties. It includes relevant information about the stake purchase, sale of shares, accusations of deceit, and the response from Revolution Beauty. The article does not contain significant digressions, misleading information, sensationalism, or bias. However, it could benefit from more context about the previous legal battles and shareholder revolts mentioned.
Noise Level: 3
Noise Justification: The article provides relevant information about a legal battle between Revolution Beauty and a former investor, including the amount of the claim and the accusations made. It also mentions the company’s response and recent developments. However, the article contains some repetitive information and includes a somewhat unrelated mention of Superdry co-founder and chief executive Julian Dunkerton at the end.
Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: The legal battle and claims against Revolution Beauty may impact the company’s financial performance and reputation. It could also affect investor confidence in the beauty industry.
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Rating Justification: The article discusses a legal battle and claims against Revolution Beauty, which can have financial implications for the company and potentially impact the beauty industry. However, there is no mention of an extreme event.
www.retailgazette.co.uk