Retail Industry Fights Back Against Taxman’s Aggressive Pursuit
- BRC criticizes HMRC’s enforcement of pay rules
- Retailers targeted for accidentally violating outdated rules
- HMRC enforces rules despite ongoing review
- Iceland faced £21m tax bill over Christmas saving scheme
The British Retail Consortium (BRC) has criticized the HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for continuing to enforce outdated pay rules against retailers, claiming that it is ‘unreasonable’ while the rules are under review by ministers. The BRC argues that most of the targeted retailers have taken ‘all reasonable steps to comply’. In a letter to HMRC, the trade body stated that it was inappropriate for tax officials to chase companies over cases relating to salaried workers and salary sacrifice schemes. Iceland faced a £21 million tax bill due to a Christmas saving scheme allowing workers to set aside a portion of their weekly wage to be claimed back later. Helen Dickinson, CEO at the BRC, said, ‘The regulations, now two decades old, are no longer fit for purpose and it is right they are under review.’ The HMRC responded that it enforces the rules ‘in line with the law’ and will not halt action against companies breaching them. A statement from HMRC read: ‘We can only enforce the law and the rules as they stand now and are therefore not in a position to pause or alter enforcement activity on the basis that there is an open consultation.’
Factuality Level: 8
Factuality Justification: The article provides accurate information about the British Retail Consortium’s demand for HMRC to cease action against retailers who have breached pay rules and includes quotes from relevant sources such as Helen Dickinson and HMRC. It also explains the context of the situation with Iceland being hit with a £21m tax bill and HMRC’s stance on enforcing the current laws.
Noise Level: 3
Noise Justification: The article provides relevant information about the British Retail Consortium’s demand for HMRC to cease action against retailers who have breached pay rules and includes quotes from both parties involved in the issue. It also briefly explains the context of the situation with Iceland being hit with a £21m tax bill. However, it could provide more details on the specifics of the pay rules and the ongoing consultation process.
Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: Retailers and taxation authorities
Financial Rating Justification: The article discusses the British Retail Consortium’s demand for HMRC to cease action against retailers who have breached pay rules, which impacts financial matters related to minimum wage and taxation. It also mentions a specific case involving Iceland facing a £21m tax bill, showing the potential financial impact on companies.
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: No
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: No
Extreme Rating Justification: There are no extreme events mentioned in the article.
www.retailsector.co.uk