Fashion Retailer Responds to Slavery Accusations

  • Boohoo responds to allegations of slavery and poor working conditions at supplier Jaswal Fashions
  • Undercover report reveals workers making Boohoo clothes for £3.50 an hour, less than half the minimum wage
  • Boohoo claims Jaswal Fashions was not a declared supplier and is no longer trading as a garment manufacturer
  • Retailer to investigate how its garments ended up with culpable company and review relationships with subcontractors
  • Boohoo committed to supporting UK manufacturing and driving up standards in supply chain

Boohoo has responded to allegations of slavery and poor working conditions at a supplier factory following an undercover report by The Sunday Times. The retailer had previously defended its business practices amidst accusations that it was putting workers in Leicester factories at risk of contracting coronavirus. Workers’ rights group Labour Behind the Label claimed that employees were forced to work while sick with Covid-19 and that some were denied pay when isolating. Boohoo denies these claims, stating that Jaswal Fashions was not a declared supplier and is no longer operating as a garment manufacturer. The company is now investigating how its products ended up in the hands of the culpable firm and will urgently review relationships with subcontractors. It remains committed to supporting UK manufacturing and driving up standards across the supply chain, promising to terminate relationships with suppliers not adhering to its code of conduct.

Factuality Level: 8
Factuality Justification: The article provides accurate information about Boohoo’s response to allegations of slavery and poor working conditions at a supplier factory, and includes relevant details about the situation without any significant issues related to digressions, misleading information, sensationalism, redundancy, or personal perspective presented as fact. However, it could be improved by providing more context on the specific actions Boohoo is taking to address the issue.
Noise Level: 6
Noise Justification: The article provides relevant information about Boohoo’s response to allegations of poor working conditions at a supplier factory, but it could benefit from more evidence or data to support the claims made by Labour Behind the Label and The Sunday Times. It also lacks analysis of long-term trends or possibilities in the fashion industry regarding labor practices.
Financial Relevance: Yes
Financial Markets Impacted: Boohoo’s stock price may be impacted by these allegations
Financial Rating Justification: The article discusses financial relevance as it involves a company in the fashion retail industry and its business practices, which can have an effect on the company’s reputation and potentially its stock price. It also mentions that Boohoo is taking immediate action to investigate the situation and improve standards in its supply chain, which could impact financial markets.
Presence Of Extreme Event: No
Nature Of Extreme Event: Other
Impact Rating Of The Extreme Event: Minor
Extreme Rating Justification: There is no extreme event mentioned in the article, but the allegations of poor working conditions and slavery at a supplier factory could potentially have minor impact on Boohoo’s reputation and business relationships.

Reported publicly: www.retailsector.co.uk